We refer here to Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's two-part enunciation, Empire _and _Multitude. These books come from a post-68 ethico-political theoretical discussion about the specificity of modern forms of power, especially capitalist power; of labor-related subjectivities; of the relation of instrumental reason and physical domination to mental and affective singularity that can never be fully dominated or determined; it focuses on the instability capitalism always creates as a destructive productivity that produces opportunities for changing the experience of work, kinship, energy, subjectivity, ideology, and commmunity. There's a weird way that it's trying to recalibrate utopianism and pragmatism. We could write a book review. It would be solidaristic, frustrated, and critical. But this is mostly a shout-out to a kinship with the big ambitions of a politics that's greedy to reframe big pictures, make claims, be contradictory, and attend to feeling and affect as empirical knowledge within the political.
Skip to end of metadata Go to start of metadata